The PCC of Goffs Oak

Hertfordshire

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

The PCC of Goffs Oak scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

What does this rating mean?

The PCC of Goffs Oak in Hertfordshire has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes — it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Pear Tree Walk,
Cheshunt,
Hertfordshire,

The PCC of Goffs Oak Hygiene Rating - 5/5

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for The PCC of Goffs Oak. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects The PCC of Goffs Oak?

Food hygiene at The PCC of Goffs Oak is inspected by Broxbourne, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.broxbourne.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about The PCC of Goffs Oak

What is The PCC of Goffs Oak’s food hygiene rating?

The PCC of Goffs Oak has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 10 September 2020.

When was The PCC of Goffs Oak last inspected?

The PCC of Goffs Oak was last inspected by Broxbourne on 10 September 2020.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes — 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.