Worx a Treat

Bradford

Food hygiene rating 4 / 5 · Good

Squeaky clean

Worx a Treat scored a 4 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Generally satisfactory Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 10 July 2025 by Bradford.

What does this rating mean?

Worx a Treat in Bradford has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

34 Oakdale Avenue,
Bradford,
BD6 1RN

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Worx a Treat. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Worx a Treat?

Food hygiene at Worx a Treat is inspected by Bradford, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.bradford.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Worx a Treat

What is Worx a Treat’s food hygiene rating?

Worx a Treat has a food hygiene rating of 4 out of 5 (Good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 10 July 2025.

When was Worx a Treat last inspected?

Worx a Treat was last inspected by Bradford on 10 July 2025.

Is a 4 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

A 4 out of 5 is good. Hygiene standards were found to be good at the last inspection, just short of the top mark.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.