Peelers Cafe

Bradford

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Peelers Cafe scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Very good Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 10 January 2026 by Bradford.

What does this rating mean?

Peelers Cafe in Bradford has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

Peel Park,
Cliffe Road,
Bradford,
BD3 0LT

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Peelers Cafe. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Peelers Cafe?

Food hygiene at Peelers Cafe is inspected by Bradford, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.bradford.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Peelers Cafe

What is Peelers Cafe’s food hygiene rating?

Peelers Cafe has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 10 January 2026.

When was Peelers Cafe last inspected?

Peelers Cafe was last inspected by Bradford on 10 January 2026.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.