Sweet2debelly

Kent

Food hygiene rating 5 / 5 · Very good

Squeaky clean

Sweet2debelly scored a 5 out of 5 at its last inspection. Tuck in.

The breakdown

Hygiene Good Cleanliness & condition Very good Confidence in management Good

Last inspected on 25 November 2025 by Bexley.

What does this rating mean?

Sweet2debelly in Kent has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (very good). On the Food Standards Agency scale, 5 is the best and 0 is the worst. Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

The rating reflects standards found at the last inspection. It is not a verdict on how the food tastes - it scores how well the business manages food safety. How often a place is inspected depends on its risk: lower-rated and higher-risk businesses are revisited more often than spotless ones.

Where is it?

11 - 15 Market Place,
Bexleyheath,
Kent,
DA6 7DZ

This is the official Food Standards Agency hygiene badge for Sweet2debelly. The data is published by the FSA under the Open Government Licence.

Who inspects Sweet2debelly?

Food hygiene at Sweet2debelly is inspected by Bexley, the local authority responsible for this area. You can reach them at http://www.bexley.gov.uk or [email protected].

Questions about Sweet2debelly

What is Sweet2debelly’s food hygiene rating?

Sweet2debelly has a food hygiene rating of 5 out of 5 (Very good), based on its last Food Standards Agency inspection on 25 November 2025.

When was Sweet2debelly last inspected?

Sweet2debelly was last inspected by Bexley on 25 November 2025.

Is a 5 out of 5 hygiene rating good?

Yes - 5 is the top food hygiene rating. It means hygiene standards were very good at the last inspection.

What do the food hygiene scores mean?

The rating combines three checks made on the day of the inspection: how hygienically food is handled, the cleanliness and condition of the premises, and how confident the inspector is that management will keep standards up. A higher overall score, from 0 up to 5, means fewer problems were found.